MUSCULAR AND FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITY OF THE TONGUE IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS IN CONDITIONS OF FUNCTIONAL OCCLUSION AND OPEN BITE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/3041-1394.2026-1.5Keywords:
dentognathic deformations, tongue pressure, orthodontic status, dentognathic apparatus, dentitionAbstract
Introduction. For the purpose of rational diagnosis, prevention and orthodontic treatment of dentognathic deformations, including open bite, it is advisable to establish and take into account correlations between tongue pressure values in different measurement zones Aim of the Study. To analyze the muscle-functional activity of the tongue in pediatric patients without components of the symptom complex of dentognathic deformations in the sagittal, vertical, transverse and open bite directions, to establish relationships between the values of tongue pressure on the surrounding areas of the oral cavity in different measurement zones. Research Materials and Methods. The force of tongue pressure (F, H) on the surrounding areas of the oral cavity of the upper and lower jaws was determined at different levels of the palatal and lingual surfaces of the teeth using a FlexiForce film force sensor (Tekscan, USA) with a surface area (S, mm²) of 78,5 mm² without stable attachment. Results. The results of tongue pressure measurements (P, kPa) on the surrounding areas of the oral cavity showed significant differences between different measurement zones at the time, when it was recommended to press the tongue on the sensor, and during swallowing, in both patients without components of the symptom complex of dentognathic deformations in the sagittal, vertical and transverse directions (n = 34) and with an open bite (n = 26). Assessment of pressure distribution showed that in children without dentognathic deformations, the pressure of the anterior part of the tongue to the palate dominates during swallowing (ZK1 > ZK3), while at the moment when patients were advised to press on the sensor, the load shifts to the lower frontal and lateral areas (Z3, Z4, Z7). The obtained results represent patterns of functional activity of the tongue in different measurement zones, which is of great importance for clinical practice, as it can be used for a comprehensive assessment of the orthodontic status of patients and the development of an optimal treatment strategy for dentognathic deformations, namely when choosing orthodontic constructions. Conclusions. The different indicators of maximum tongue pressure values revealed during the study at the moment when it was recommended to press on the sensor in pediatric patients in conditions of functional occlusion (Z4 – 103,5 ± 45,4 kPa; 95% CI: 87,7–119,4 and Z7 – 92,5 ± 40,8 kPa; 95% CI: 78,3–106,8) and with open bite (Z3 – 101,6 ± 22,4 kPa; 95% CI 92,5–110,6 and Z1 – 96,7 ± 24,2 kPa; 95% CI 86,9–106,5) indicate differences in the muscular and functional activity of the organ and reflect the features of its functional interaction with the dentition. During swallowing, among patients without components of the symptom complex of UAC deformities, the average pressure values in the area of the middle third of the palatal surface of the upper incisors (6,9 ± 2,0 kPa; 95% CI: 6,2–7,6) exceeded the average values in the area of the lingual surface of the lower incisors (5,6 ± 1,4 kPa; 95% CI: 5,1–6,1), while with open bite, the diametric opposite was established (5,2 ± 2,2 kPa; 95% CI: 4,4–6,1 versus 7,4 ± 2,3 kPa; 95% CI: 6,5–8,3). The identified clusters of consistent loads and the general fragmentation of the correlation structure indicate individualized mechanisms of functional adaptation of the tongue to occlusal conditions.
References
Фліс П.С., Філоненко В.В., Дорошенко Н.М. Частота і розповсюдженість аномалій та деформацій зубощелепного апарату в період змінного прикусу. Український стоматологічний альманах. 2016. № 1 (1). С. 75–78. URL: https://repository.pdmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/10423.
Фліс П.С., Ращенко Н.В., Філоненко В.В. та ін. Поширеність зубощелепних аномалій та мовленнєвих порушень серед дітей віком 6–12 років. Сучасна стоматологія. 2018. № 4. С. 54–57. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ss_2018_4_14.
Філоненко В.В., Канюра О.А., Паламар Б.І. та ін. Поширеність вроджених незрощень губи та піднебіння в Україні. Український стоматологічний альманах. 2023. № 4. С. 90–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31718/2409-0255.4.2023.15.
Головко Н.В. Ортодонтія. Розвиток прикусу, діагностика зубощелепних аномалій, ортодонтичний діагноз. Полтава : ПФ «Форпіка», 2003. 296 с.
Slavicek R. The masticatory organ. Function and dysfunction. Klosterneuburg : Gamma Med.-wiss, 2006. 544 р.
Alhammadi M.S., Halboub E., Fayed M.S. et al. Global distribution of malocclusion traits. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018. Vol. 23 (06). P. 40.e1–40.e10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl.
Мельник А.О., Канюра О.А., Філоненко В.В. Макроглосія: ознаки, симптоми, методи діагностики та лікування, вплив на формування зубощелепних деформацій. Вісник стоматології. 2024. № 4 (129). С. 164–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35220/2078-8916-2024-54-4.30.
Melnyk A., Filonenko V. Clinical and phonetic features of dentognathic deformations, their orthodontic treatment (Chapter). In: Ardelean L.C., Rusu L-C.C., editors. Human teeth – from function to esthetics. UK: IntechOpen, 2023. P. 315–333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.109636
Deshkar M., Thosar N.R., Kabra S.P. et al. The influence of the tongue on the development of dental malocclusion. Cureus. 2024. Vol. 16 (5). P. e61281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61281.
Núñez-Martíneza P.M., García-Delgadoa C., Morán-Barrosoa V.F., et al. Macroglosia congénita: características clínicas y estrategias de tratamiento en la edad pediátrica. Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México. 2016. Vol. 73 (3). Р. 212–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmhime.2017.08.003.
Gildener-Leapman N., Meyers A., González B. Macroglossia. 2024. Available at: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/873658-overview#a10.
Li K., Hua H., Wei P. Macroglossia. J Am Dent Assoc. 2023. Vol. 4 (154). Р. 350–354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2022.02.006.
Gabren Syller A., Iwanowski M. Tongue resting position. 2025. URL: https://adentis.pl/en/services/language-is-your-friend/tongue-resting-position/.
Kutti Sridharan G., Rokkam V.R. Macroglossia. Stat-Pearls. 2023. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560545/.
Ali A.A. Tongue thrust. 2023. URL: https://codental.uobaghdad.edu.iq/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2023/12/Athraa-Ameer.pdf.
FujitaY., Masuda S., Takeshima T., et al. Association between low tongue pressure and physical abnormalities in adolescent and young adult women. Children. 2024. Vol. 11 (12). Р. e147811. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children11121478.
Lee Y.S., Ryu J., Baek S.H., et al. Comparative analysis of the differences in dentofacial morphology according to the tongue and lip pressure. Diagnostics. 2021. Vol. 11 (3). 503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030503.
Menezes L.F., Rocha Neto A.M., Paulino C.E.B., et al. Tongue pressure and endurance in patients with Class II and Class III malocclusion. Rev CEFAC. 2025. Vol. 20 (2). Р. 166–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216201820210917.
Yu M., Gao X. Tongue pressure distribution of individual normal occlusions and exploration of related factors. J Oral Rehabil. 2019. Vol. 46 (3). Р. 249–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12741.
Valentim A.F., Furlan R.M., Perilo T.V., et al. Relationship between perception of tongue position and measures of tongue force on the teeth. CoDAS. 2016. Vol. 28 (5). Р. 546–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015256.
Azevedo N.D., Lima J.C., Furlan R.M., et al. Tongue pressure measurement in children with mouth-breathing behavior. J Oral Rehabil. 2018. Vol. 45 (8). Р. 612–617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12653.
Мельник А.О., Канюра О.А., Копчак А.В., та ін. Особливості м’язово-функціональної активності язика у пацієнтів дитячого віку з дистальним прикусом. Сучасна стоматологія. 2025. № 6. С. 27–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33295/1992-576X-2025-4-44.




